Reviewing the Classics: Wuthering Heighs by Emily Bronte revisited

wuthering heights

Hi all,

So I went to a live taping a couple of weeks back of a show called The Book Club. It was a great show – Paul Kelly sang a sonnet, and there was much discussion about a little book you might have heard of called Wuthering Heights. The discussion got heated, especially when it came to Heathcliff. For a full recap of how things went down, I’d definitely recommend stopping by Right or Wrong for a very funny, and entirely scientific analysis of the show here.

In the spirit of the debate, and since I haven’t read Wuthering Heights since I skimmed it in second-year university (nearly 20 years ago) I gave it a slightly less skimmed re-read, and what follows is my review:

This classic tale, set on the northern moors of England, has long been acclaimed as a both a torrid tale of passionate love and revenge, and a masterpiece of English literature. The main protagonist, Heathcliff, is considered by many to be one of the most smoking-hot villains to ever grace the page. A large part of it is probably because of his depictions in film looking like this:


And this:


And more recently this:


Ahh Ralph Fiennes…

Yes, they are all very attractive men. But let’s move on shall we? Back to the book.. ahem. I have to say on my rereading of the novel (handsome men above aside), I really struggled to find any attraction to the dark, brooding, taciturn man who essentially tortures and ruins his family.

While the writing of Emily Bronte’s only novel still holds its haunting beauty, and Bronte’s descriptions of the moors are so evocative that one feels as though they are standing upon them, what really stood out to me about this novel on a reread of this book are two things:

  1. The utterly restrictive social status of women during the Regency/Victorian age. As women of any standing (and Catherine, I believe, is landed gentry) were not permitted to work, were given very little education and could often not inherit, a woman’s standing and her future were entirely dictated by an agreeable marriage.
  2. The alarmingly violent intergenerational cycle of physical and emotional abuse (particularly of women, servants, and children) perpetuated by all the protagonists throughout the novel. Heathcliff is a wife beater. Hindley throws his own child over a railing in a fit of drunken rage and shoves a knife between his servant’s teeth. Hindley’s child grows up to be a violent adult. Even more telling, these brutal acts were not dwelt upon by the narrator but accepted as a matter of course.

So, in revisiting this novel, I feel that my age and a modern lense have served to lessen its appeal. As far as Heathcliff goes, I found him thoroughly unlikeable; grumpy, physically and verbally violent, grudge-holding, vengeful and spiteful, and worse – completely unrepentant (except perhaps where his Cathy is concerned). There’s a term in modern romance called: the’Alphahole’ – an Alpha character who is so utterly Alpha, that he is actually a massive jerk. It does seem that Heathcliff appeals to younger women – perhaps he could be considered the pioneer of the YA ‘Hero.’

But what do you think – does Heathcliff still set a fire in your loins?


Book Review: Watership Down by Richard Adams

484 pages
Published 1972 by Avon

Greetings Brave Adventurers,

Although Watership Down is considered a fantasy classic, I had never read it until recently. The reason for this was partly due to half-remembered snippets of the movie version of Watership Down that I had seen in my childhood, and the vague lingering notion that this book would be very grim and very sad.

To my pleasant surprise, this was no dirge, although at times it was sad, and dangerous and grim. The story goes thusly: Fiver, a young buck who sees the future, receives a frightening vision of the destruction of their warren. After failing to convince the Chief, a group of rabbits led by Hazel set out on a dangerous journey to found a new warren on the eponymous Watership Down.

So what makes a story about talking rabbits a fantasy classic? In part it is the story itself. Adams anthropomorphizes the rabbits, yet they still remain animalistic in their behaviour. Adams himself commented that he didn’t want his rabbits to do anything a real rabbit couldn’t do. He made good friends with a rabbit expert, and the two of them often took long walks on the downs together, lending his writing a detailed and beautiful sense of place. Adam’s military background is apparent in his structure of rabbit society, in the Owsla and the concept of chiefs and generals.

But the real joy of this novel is the rich tapestry of history Adams imagines for his characters. He creates for his rabbits a rich oral mythology, a folklore and a strong belief system which defines them. The novel is scattered with stories of Frith, the sun-god and El-ahrairah, the trickster. Although not a linguist, Adams also scatters the novel with Lapine, a simple rabbit language.

All of this leads to a wonderful tale, worthy of its place amongst the classics of fantasy.

10 out of 10 fluffy-tailed dragons
10 dragons